Examining Student Achievement Data
By Dr. Dorinne Dorfman, Principal
It’s hard to imagine a time when schools did not review or report student achievement data. While many concerns have been raised about the federal reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act in 2001, better known as No Child Left Behind, the law now requires every public school to publish student learning achievement. President Bush’s remark, “The soft prejudice of low expectations,” hit home across the country, as school officials had to admit that students from low-income or minority backgrounds or eligible for special education performed considerably below grade level. And the gap only widened as they rose through the grades. Controversy over the value of student achievement on standardized tests continues, though no one disputes that huge learning gaps exist and that only a few schools have succeeded in closing the gap.
In November, Vermont’s Commissioner of Education Armando Vilaseca spoke at the annual meeting of the Vermont Standards Board for Professional Educators, attended by our superintendent, Dr. Steven John. There Commissioner Vilaseca shared the persistent shortcomings of Vermont schools:
- Girls outperform boys in nearly every subject tested.
- High school boys overall score very low.
- Those from low-income families perform far lower than middle - or high-income students.
- While Vermont has the second highest high school graduation rate in the country, only 45% go on to postsecondary education. About half of them earn a bachelor’s degree in four years, which is just 23% of all Vermont students.
The Commissioner went on to say that schools should prepare all students for postsecondary education, even those who choose not to pursue the opportunity. Further, to raise expectations and connect to the wider world, schools should consider requiring foreign language.
Along with 44 other states, Vermont has adopted the Common Core State Standards for reading, writing, and mathematics. The new standards go into effect in fall 2014.
Central to the Common Core is teaching all students on grade level and providing direct academic support to help struggling students succeed. Last fall, Leland and Gray began offering regular education English and mathematics support classes in grades 7 and 8. We plan to expand these support classes into 9th grade in the fall of 2012. Elementary schools have provided such interventions for decades, since without the basics, students had no chance. Since No Child Left Behind, middle and high schools have increasingly funded licensed teachers to give more instruction to struggling students. With nearly every Vermont high school now identified as not attaining “Adequate Yearly Progress” on state tests, school officials can no longer ignore the achievement gaps.
As required by NCLB, each year Leland and Gray publishes our scores on the New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) exams for each student group. Students who are eligible for free - or reduced-priced meals (FRM) perform lower than middle - and high-income students, though L&G’s FRM students perform better than the state average. Yet these data only scratch the surface. How are these students doing in their classes? Which courses do they take? Course enrollment and achievement data by gender and FRM eligibility paint a clearer picture about our students’ choices. At this level of detail, maintaining confidentiality about individual students is critical, which all teachers are trained to uphold.
How does reviewing data improve education? When administrators and teachers examine the demographics of student enrollment in accelerated and below-grade level courses, they recognize patterns that mirror poor performance on the NEACP exam. But isn’t that the difference between elementary and secondary school, that teenagers get to pick their classes? To improve student achievement, would Leland and Gray actually stop students from taking below grade-level classes?
Yes. Now that FRM eligibility has grown by 24% over last year, educators must encourage more students to choose an academically challenging path to graduation. Reduced family income for teens often leads to more stress, less time for studies, greater need for a job in high school, and reduced academic ambitions. Due to the recession, educators throughout the entire United States need to work very hard to prevent so many newly poor children from choosing low expectations for themselves and their futures. Given the global competition, could there be a worse time for students to avoid grade-level and Advanced Placement courses or, after graduation, refuse to attend professional training or college?
In my travels, I have visited high schools where every section of core subjects except one was taught below grade-level. I have seen whole schools of low-income youth with no college-preparatory courses offered at all. With the adoption of the Common Core State Standards, perhaps the Obama administration has set its sights on competing with high-achieving nations such as Finland, South Korea, and China. These countries not only scored the highest in the 2009 Programme for International Student Assessment, but had the narrowest achievement gap by income level. The report, Disadvantaged Students who Succeed at School, includes the English-speaking countries Canada, Australia, and New Zealand among those who have been the most successful in reaching students from low-income families. These high-performing disadvantaged students are called “resilient.” Worldwide, 40% of girls but only 23% of boys are resilient (OECD 50). The OECD found two factors that contributed to these students’ success in science achievement:
- Students maintained a positive attitude towards learning.
- Schools allocated significantly more time to science lessons in regular education classes than in other schools.
In fact, “it appears that while all students benefit from attending compulsory science courses, in several countries disadvantaged students benefit more than more advantaged students from attending compulsory courses” (OECD 83).
Back in our small part of the planet, what does all this mean?
- It means that L&G and Vermont are not alone with the challenge of educating children, particularly boys, from low-income backgrounds.
- It means that, with rising unemployment and poverty levels, public schools will experience higher failure and dropout rates, unless educators provide significant interventions.
- It means that L&G and Vermont must take real action, program and course changes, to improve the achievement of these and all students.
- It means that parents/guardians, students, and community members can expect changes from the way things used to be at school. Specifically, course requirements and academic support will increase so that virtually all students participate in grade-level and Advanced Placement learning.
- It means that educators at L&G and local elementary schools will increase coordination of curriculum and instruction, leaving no gaps in information or skill development.
- It means that, while supporting students’ healthy social and emotional development, school counselors will continually challenge them to learn to use their minds well by thinking abstractly in Algebra II through Calculus, by writing expressively and accurately in English, by analyzing critically in social studies, by problem-solving in science, and practicing intrepidly in foreign language.
- It means that all L&G and local elementary teachers will instruct reading and writing, which is the most effective way to improve student learning.
Now in my second year at Leland and Gray, I continue to be deeply impressed by the caring and commitment of our teachers. From the recession and Irene to Community Prevention Night and Feed the Thousands, their first instinct is to support our students. They know that the future of our community and, more broadly, of our country, rests in the minds, hands, and hearts of our youth. In sum, L&G will make much bigger deposits in many more students’ brains than before.
Works Cited
OECD. PISA 2009 at a Glance. OECD Publishing, 2010. Web. 1 January 2012.
OECD. Against the Odds: Disadvantaged Students Who Succeed in School. OECD Publishing. 2011. Web. 1 January 2012.
Vilaseca, Armando. Vermont Standards Board for Professional Educators. Montpelier, VT 29 November 2011. Presentation.
Students at work: seventh graders Willie Bush, Walker Hamer and senior Caitlin Persa